Solymar Colling vs Salma Ewing Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recent data shows Ewing has a slight edge, winning 40.88% of points on their second serve compared to Colling's 36.26%.
• Return Game: Colling outperforms Ewing in return games, securing 53.97% of points on opponents' second serves versus Ewing's 47.7%. For first serve returns, Colling has a slight lead at 34.86% against Ewing's 32.42%.
• Under Pressure: Colling demonstrates better resilience under pressure, saving 50.32% of breakpoints, surpassing Ewing's 42.6%.
• Performance Overview: Over the last year, Colling's match win rate stands at 52.38%, a bit higher than Ewing's 47.73%.
• Preferred Surface: Both players excel on hard courts with Ewing's win rate at 60% and Colling's at 58%. Who adapts best to this surface?
• Player Level: At Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, Ewing records a 50% match win rate, slightly better than Colling's 48.48%.
• Quality of Opponents: Colling has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 336.57 compared to Ewing’s 360.14. Does facing tougher competition give Colling an edge?
• Deciding Set Performance: Colling has a significant advantage in deciding sets, winning 44% compared to Ewing's 27% across matches.
• Break Point Conversion: Colling is more effective in converting break points, achieving a rate of 44.94% compared to Ewing's 35.09%.

Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming tennis match between Colling and Ewing, several key performance indicators provide insight into who holds the advantage.

Ewing's strengths lie in winning on second serve points, which might give them an edge in service games. However, Colling's superior capabilities in return games and breaking serve opportunities could offset this advantage.

Under pressure, Colling appears more adept at saving breakpoints, indicative of their mental resilience on the court. Furthermore, Colling has shown better performance in deciding sets compared to Ewing, which could be crucial if this match extends into a tense final set situation.

Both players have shown a preference for hard surfaces, but Ewing's slightly higher success rate on this surface doesn't overshadow Colling's overall solid track record and recent form.

In conclusion, based on the ability to convert break points, defend against pressure, and perform against higher-ranked competitors, Colling is more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.